← Search

Daniel Archer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 11W–4L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history15 matches
W
2026-07-08 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Drew Freeman
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-1
W
2026-06-30 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grayson Garmaker
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grayson Garmaker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grayson Garmaker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-07-18 · TUL: Howard/LF · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Williford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-07-08 · TUL: Howard/LF · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Williford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-13 · TUL: Howard/LF · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Samantha Schoenhofer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-05-23 · Lusnak/LF · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kate Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.9% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Singles
13%
2 matches
#2 Singles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal