← Search

Lisa Jaffe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burlingame, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 11W–10L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history21 matches
L
2026-05-13 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Midori Yan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-02 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-05-21 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-18 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-04-27 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-05-05 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Coker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-20 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Pontius
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-07 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-06-18 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Pacheco
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-05-21 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Norma Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-05-01 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Norma Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-04-03 · ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aviva Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal