← Search

Emily Pierce

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
— year-end
28 matches · 3W–25L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history28 matches
L
2022-09-20 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maggie Duff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-08-09 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maggie Duff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-12 · Powers, Catherine · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robyn Pressley
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-21 · Powers, Catherine · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tracy Roan
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-09-20 · Powers, Catherine · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Hailey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2021-08-23 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jaime van Dan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2021-07-29 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime van Dan
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-20 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Powers
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-08 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Galatas
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-06-14 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Powers
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-23 · Powers, Catherine · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Galatas
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-04-12 · Powers, Catherine · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Teams9 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games
3.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 19.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.3% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 28.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer