← Search

John Drew

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chelmsford, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 35W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history56 matches
W
2026-08-23 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Zurn championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Ritter championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Segal championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Segal
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Zurn
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Ritter
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Segal
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-13 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Segal
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-09 · WESF:Westfit:Segal · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Grad
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
4.0
62.5%
35W–21L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Singles
20%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams