← Search

Daniel Piekarsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 34W–54L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history88 matches
L
2026-04-10 · Indy X40 8.0 IUTC Ochsner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sunny Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Indy X18 8.0 IUTC Ochsner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mimi Murphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · Indy A18 4.0M TUE IUTC Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colton Butcher
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-06 · Indy X18 8.0 IUTC Ochsner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mimi Murphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-16 · Indy X18 8.0 IUTC Ochsner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mimi Murphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · Indy A18 4.0M TUE IUTC Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Glaholt
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-21 · CIN A18 4.0M IUTC Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Stephens
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-19 · CIN A18 4.0M IUTC Piekarsky · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Dzubay
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.6% of games
4.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 42.1% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 48.5% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert