← Search

Mark Carlson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
COTTONWOOD, AZ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history14 matches
L
2024-06-16 · Kolody · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Riggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-16 · Kolody · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Guzley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-11 · Kolody · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Pilsl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2024-05-11 · Kolody · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Pilsl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-22 · NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Linden
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-10-22 · NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Linden
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-09-23 · NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Linden
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2020-10-14 · 4.0 PhxCC Grabel Conklin M18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Kwan
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2020-09-30 · 4.0 PhxCC Grabel Conklin M18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Kwan
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2020-03-04 · 4.0 PhxCC Conklin M18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Grabel
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2020-02-19 · 4.0 PhxCC Conklin M18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Riviere
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2020-02-12 · 4.0 PhxCC Conklin M18S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Douglass
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 50.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 71% of the time
#2 Doubles
71%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer