← Search

Gillian Donahey

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 95W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gillian Donahey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Mix N Match · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeremy Glassco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Fazal Shariff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · Mix N Match · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Darwin Sloop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Mix N Match · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeremy Glassco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fazal Shariff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Porritt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Match Makers · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Raley / Kate Raley
2026-06-15 · Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celita Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · Net Positive 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Net Positive 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Net Positive 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Darnall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · Match Makers · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
87%
20W–3L · 64.7% of games
3.5
46%
40W–47L · 47.1% of games
4.0
18.6%
8W–35L · 34.6% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.8% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.1% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
47 matches
#1 Singles
21%
45 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams