← Search

Jill Bakken

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilton, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 34W–71L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history105 matches
L
2025-04-19 · CP:Women who Lunch:Barnwell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Packard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-12 · CP:Women who Lunch:Barnwell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eileen Raleigh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-08 · CP:Women who Lunch:Barnwell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Raskopf
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-11-10 · Yonkers United · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Constantine mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-03 · Yonkers United · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kunal Maini mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-10-25 · Yonkers United · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kunal Maini mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-01-06 · Yonkers T.C. · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Sosnow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-12-15 · Yonkers T.C. · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Chin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2023-12-10 · Yonkers T.C. · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Davon Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-03 · Yonkers T.C. · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edgar Torres mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-19 · Yonkers T.C. · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Chin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-12 · Yonkers T.C. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregg David mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2025
CP:Women who Lunch:Barnwell
2025 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 8.0 55 & Over Women - 1/5 · 55+
2025
Yonkers United
2025 18&Over Mixed · 7.0 · 18+
2025
TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick
2024 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2/12 · 40+
2024
Yonkers T.C.
2024 18&Over Mixed · 8.0 · 18+
2024
4S:Wise Aces:Watson/CoConis
2023 SCT Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 2/10 · 18+
2023
TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick
2023 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2/12 · 40+
2023
TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick
2023 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women (2/12) · 18+
2023
NC:Bad Aces:Havens
2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women - 2/12 · 18+
2022
NC:Salomon Slice Girls:Salomon/Isaza
2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 4.0 W - 3/16 · 18+
2022
NC:Salomon Slice Girls:Salomon/Isaza
2022 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2/11 · 40+
2022
NC:Salomon Slice Girls:Salomon/Isaza
2021 SCT Tri-Level · Tri-Level Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 (2/6)
2022
D - NC:8.0 Mixed All AboutThat Ace:Gardiner/Bakken
2021 SCT Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 2/13 · 18+
2021
NC:4.0 All About That Ace:Gardiner
2021 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 4.0 W 2/12 · 18+
2021
NC:40+ All About That Ace W/E:Gardiner
2021 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2/9 · 40+
2021
SOL:4.0 All About That Ace:Gardiner
2021 SCT SUMMER Adult 18 & Over Women (2 doubles) · 4.0 Adult Women - 1/3 · 18+
2021
4S:Wise Aces:Gehrlein/Watson
2020 SCT Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 2/11 · 40+
2020
4S:Wise Aces:Gehrlein/Watson
2020 SCT Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 3/14 · 18+
2020
CP:18+ Summer CP Chiquitas:Gardiner
2020 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 W · 18+
2020
CP:Chelsea Chiquitas 4.0 18+:Gardiner
2020 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 4.0 W 3/19 · 18+
2020
CP:Chelsea Chiquitas 4.0 40+:Gardiner/Sullivan
2020 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2/13 · 40+
2020
Grand Slam: GameSetMatch
2020 18&Over Women Day Winter · 4.0 Day · 18+
2020
CP:3.5 40:Gardiner/Hill
2019 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 4/21 · 40+
2019
CP:3.5:Hill/Sullivan
2019 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 3.5 Women 4/28 · 18+
2019
CP:Chelsea Chiquitas:Gardiner
2019 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women · 18+
2019
CP:Easy Lovers:Villa
2019 SCT Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 8.0 40 & Over Mixed 2/12 · 40+
2019
CP:Love Hurts:Piksinska/Welch
2019 SCT Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 2/13 · 18+
2019
CP:Love is a Battlefield:Villa/Gardiner
2019 SCT Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 3/15 · 18+
2019
CP:Varsity Team:Villa
2019 SCT Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 7.0 40 & Over Mixed 2/11 · 40+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
32.3%
20W–42L · 42.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
19.2%
5W–21L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer