← Search

Annette Dinneen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 28W–77L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Bellamy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Minyard
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-19 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Bellamy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Savi Danforth
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Bellamy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Lawrence
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Myers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Komlanc
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Bellamy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Heck
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Myers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Fasig
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Bellamy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Lawrence
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Bellamy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Pai
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Myers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Wagner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Bellamy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Oakley
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Myers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Komlanc
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Myers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leigh Ann Price
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.1% of games
3.5
20%
5W–20L · 37.3% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.6% of games
6.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 35.7% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 31.2% of games
6.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.5% of games
6.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer