← Search

Camila Gilsenan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Daniel Island, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 102W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
W
2026-10-30 · LCTA54/Gilsenan/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peart
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA39/Ward/DIC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Baker
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-02 · LCTA54/Gilsenan/DIC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Baker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA39/Ward/DIC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Porter
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-25 · LCTA54/Gilsenan/DIC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peart
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · LCTA18/Moskowitz/DIC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Reshma Sahakian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · LCTA18/Moskowitz/DIC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Paige Irvin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · LCTA55/Brodsky/DIC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele B Goetshius
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · LCTA18/Moskowitz/DIC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Paige Irvin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · LCTA (A) 3.0W 55 & Over (Gilsenan) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianne Potts championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · LCTA (A) 3.0W 55 & Over (Gilsenan) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peart championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · LCTA (A) 3.0W 55 & Over (Gilsenan) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peart championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
67.8%
82W–39L · 58% of games
3.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 38.7% of games
5.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.7% of games
6.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 47.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer