← Search

Richard Clewell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Davenport, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-04-19 · Smith/Butcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-25 · Smith/Butcher · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Petre
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · Smith/Butcher · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Mahoski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-01-26 · IAWC/Smith/Clewell/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Teasdale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-17 · IAWC/Smith/Clewell/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-09-22 · IAWC/Smith/Clewell/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-01-28 · IA/Thomasson/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick O'Leary
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-10-29 · IA/Thomasson/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Petre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-03-05 · Thomasson/Clewell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with RANDY RICHARDS
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-08 · Thomasson/Clewell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Nebergall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2022-01-09 · Thomasson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Wilber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2021-12-05 · Thomasson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Lotz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
52%
13W–12L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams