← Search

Kathleen Stallings

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Helena, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 118W–55L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-29 · MBY - Misner/Baxter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-17 · West Homewood - Barber/Lacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Vaughn
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-15 · MBY - Misner/Baxter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-07 · West Homewood - Barber/Lacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Misner
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · MBY - Misner/Baxter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nital Patel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · BH - Matthews · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbie Kotarski championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · BH - Matthews · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Reidinger championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · BH - Matthews · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Reidinger championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-19 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Matthews · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marie Bateh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Matthews · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anne Matthews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80.6%
29W–7L · 64.1% of games
4.0
69.4%
59W–26L · 57.7% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.2% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 60% of games
8.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer