← Search

Tony Almanza

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Mesa, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history24 matches
L
2025-06-15 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schumann
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-01 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schumann
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-18 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Yaldo
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-27 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schumann
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christian Booth
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-11 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray (2 @8:30AM: 3)/ Davalos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Hill
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-24 · SD 7.0 Mtn View/ Rozo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Viviana Rozo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-11-06 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Runde · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melvin Pascoguin
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-10-23 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Runde · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Rothberg
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-10-02 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Runde · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melvin Pascoguin
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-11 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Runde · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Flores
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-27 · SD 3.5 Mountain View/ Rundle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Malonzo
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams