Emily Jensen
33 matches · 11W–22L · seasons 2019–2021
Captains: add Emily Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history33 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Teams12 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.