Marc Albo
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI
68 matches · 29W–39L · seasons 2016–2024
Match history68 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2025
2LIFE-BEARD 45M WE 18&O SEM F2
4LIFE-BEARD AD18&O WED 45 MEN SEM F1
4PINE-in-SNELL 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F5
5FAC-PAYNE 18&O MIX 9.0 SEM
2EAST-KEAN AD18&O 40M TU SEM F3
5EAST-KEAN TRI-LEVEL M AUG 454035 SEM
5LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5M COMBO W/E SEM F2
1DEER-WALSH men tri-level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 sem F1
2DEER-ARENS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F4
2LTF-SZYMANSKI 85 MEN COMBO SEM F2
3PEACH-LATTIE 85M COMBO SEM F1
5LIFE-ALBO 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
5WESS-EVANS 45M 18&O AD WED SEM F3
2LIFE-SZYMANSKI 85 MEN COMBO SEM
drop july 24 LIFE-ALBO 40m 18 tues sem F2
drop july 6 LIFE-DHARIA 70mix 18 sem F3
1WESS-EVANS 45MEN 18 WED SEM F1
2DEER-KERIN 40MEN 18 TUES SEM F6
2LIFE-SZYMANSKI 85 combo men SEM F1
2WESS-(hard)SALTSMAN 40msing winwe sem f2
2WESS-TANGUAY 9.0 mix 18&O sem f1
4LIFE-PATALINGHUG 8.0 mix 18&O sem f4
LIFE-PATALINGHUG MENS TRI-LEVEL 4.5,4.0,3.5 SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 50.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–10L · 32% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.