← Search

Rob Hagerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Virginia Beach, VA
4.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
30 matches · 15W–15L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history30 matches
W
2025-05-24 · VanDaniker - BAM · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen van Daniker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · VanDaniker - BAM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Long mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-12 · VanDaniker - BAM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Long mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-5
W
2025-05-02 · VanDaniker - BAM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Long mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-23 · VanDaniker - BAM · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Long mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-05-03 · Fanney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Deaver mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-26 · Fanney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Cutchins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-12 · Fanney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen van Daniker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-11-18 · DREAM TEAM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caroline Dozier mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-11-04 · DREAM TEAM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Wilson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-26 · DREAM TEAM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caroline Dozier mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-07-27 · GAME SET MATCH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Bailey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
100%
9W–0L · 70.8% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 37.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe