← Search

Kurt Suchomel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shoreham, VT
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 7W–17L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history24 matches
L
2026-03-01 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-15 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-11-02 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Bradford Brainard / Maea Brandt
2025-10-25 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-04 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cinny Lawrence mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-12-11 · MIT:Mixed Nuts:Potter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Bark mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2020-02-23 · MIT:Collas · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Didricksen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2020-02-09 · MIT:Collas · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-02 · MIT:Collas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2020-01-11 · ESB:Venus & Mars II:Kirkpatrick/Melen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2019-12-08 · ESB:Venus & Mars II:Kirkpatrick/Melen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2019-11-03 · ESB:Venus & Mars II:Kirkpatrick/Melen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer