Search

Denise Hoxsey

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 91W–186L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Denise Hoxsey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history277 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle DuClos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Sommer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Lueg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-09 · Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauri Heitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-01 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Haffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · Boyd/Eveker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Maritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susy Broderick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-02 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
L
2026-03-01 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tori Cheatham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.2% of games
3.5
33.5%
72W–143L · 43% of games
4.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 40.2% of games
7.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova