← Search

Tuck Curren

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 37W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-05-30 · Tulsa/Dollman/LF 65s 7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David McCorkle championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Dean championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · OK/Dollman/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Dean championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · OK/Dollman/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Dean championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · Dean/LF 55s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Cowell
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Dean/LF 55s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Dean
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-05 · Tulsa/Dollman/LF 65s 7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Dean
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Dean/LF 55s 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Vestal
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Tulsa/Dollman/LF 65s 7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lars Engle
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · Dean/LF 55s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Burnham
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-10-11 · Steve Dollmann/Tulsa · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Ferris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-11 · Steve Dollmann/Tulsa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Dollmann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.2%
35W–32L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
22 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe