← Search

Steven Anagnost

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 95W–91L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history186 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Bell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-19 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Brunk
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-13 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-05 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Bell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-28 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Brunk
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-14 · Lott/FR/40&over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Brunk
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Schmidt/LF/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Harrelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
Default
2026-08-17 · Schmidt/LF/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Harrelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-02 · Schmidt/LF/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Harrelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · Wallen-Press/GR 18s 3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Morton
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Files-Paxson/LF/55s 7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doyle Bishop
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · Files-Paxson/LF/55s 7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Sills
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 55.8% of games
3.5
29.2%
14W–34L · 41.9% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.3% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 49.1% of games
5.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
5.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.4% of games
6.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
47.8%
22W–24L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
34 matches
#1 Singles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams