← Search

Andrew Abell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New York, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history40 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Abell/Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Pincay
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nic Goslar championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nihar Damarasingu championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Spencer Koh
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Mekles, Todd · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nihar Damarasingu
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-02 · Abell · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Zhao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · Mekles, Todd · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Hertel
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Abell · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Perry
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Carlos Correa
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Abell · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-28 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nihar Damarasingu
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Godlewski
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
50%
14W–14L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams