← Search

Angela Radigan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakewood Ranch, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 4W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-03-23 · LWR Passion Reds · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Ettinger
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-12 · LWR Passion Reds · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Perella
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-15 · Sarasota/Voltz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Quick
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-03 · Sarasota/Voltz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-20 · Sarasota/Voltz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-03-22 · Sarasota/Voltz/55&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Ruggero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-02-03 · Sarasota/Voltz/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kerri Harter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-30 · LWR Gottlieb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Gottlieb
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-23 · LWR Gottlieb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Beatty
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-05-16 · LWR Gottlieb · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-04 · LWR Gottlieb · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-03-28 · LWR Gottlieb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Bieringer
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.1% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova