← Search

Lanette Maurina

Elkhorn, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
71 matches · 41W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Elkhorn · 3.5
5 of 6
WI · 3.5
103 of 187
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Lanette is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lanette has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lanette has gone from the 87th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
65.3%
32W–17L · 56.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #4 Doubles · with Sam Gardner
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
Susan Schmidt / Stacee Busaterichamps
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Barkdoll
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Barkdoll
−0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Polkow
+0.066better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jessica Berg / Elizabeth Lindquist
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Polkow
+0.053better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Laura Cruse / Jennifer Sturm
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renita Domek
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Elizabeth Lindquist / Natalie Shafer
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Anne Daniels / Andrea Rowe
2025-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weiler
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.