← Search

Janette O Logan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Upper Marlboro, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 205W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history273 matches
L
2026-11-01 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natasha Rones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · The Vicious Vollies · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denise Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with April Braxton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Scaler championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Humphrey championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Campbell championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · LoVV Seasoned · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crenee Singletary
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · LoVV Seasoned · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darlene Walker
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-07-29 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carol Humphrey
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dannielle Freeman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-26 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Lincoln mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Freeman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.8% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.1% of games
4.0
81.4%
83W–19L · 61.9% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.5% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.3% of games
8.0
88.3%
53W–7L · 62.6% of games
8.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 51.6% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 37% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
68.4%
26W–12L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
84 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams