← Search

Nan Spadacene

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midland, MI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 7W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history13 matches
W
2026-09-19 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-22 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-22 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-01 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Bickmore
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · Team Steele · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Blewett
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-22 · Team Richter/Bretz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Gorte
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-21 · Team Richter/Bretz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lee Bretz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
Nicole Johnson / Marivic Laynes
2024-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Roberts
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
Nicole Johnson / Renu Madala
2024-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Roberts
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2023-06-27 · YOU GOT SERVED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lambert
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-05-19 · YOU GOT SERVED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Smock
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2019-07-11 · 3.5W 40&O Hagen · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#1 Singles
15%
2 matches
Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams