← Search

Ginger Jakins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jefferson, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 189W–120L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history309 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Alberta Banks-Jakins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Brown Stok
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · Georgia Club/Christian · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Rentz
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-14 · Alberta Banks-Jakins · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-09 · Georgia Club/Christian · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Rentz
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-05 · Alberta Banks-Jakins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Coley
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · Alberta Banks (Ginger Jakins)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Dempsey
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Alberta Banks (Ginger Jakins)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Everhart
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · NEGTA/Ginger Jakins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Brewer championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · NEGTA/Ginger Jakins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Brewer championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · NEGTA/Ginger Jakins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Drake championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · NEGTA/Ginger Jakins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Brewer championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · NEGTA/Ginger Jakins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Drake championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams109 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 55.6% of games
3.5
68.4%
128W–59L · 54.5% of games
4.0
26.3%
15W–42L · 43% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
7.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.2% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
66 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams