Search

Jonathan Ferrell

Waldorf, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
298 matches · 101W–197L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Jonathan Ferrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history298 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Bloomquist · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Murduck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Murduck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Bloomquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Bloomquist · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Witting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Witting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-13 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Bloomquist · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wyche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Giap Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Swann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Carrington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Mccafferty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Nhi Phung / Matthew Warrenmixed
2026-04-30 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Lebow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Carrington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
28.7%
25W–62L · 41.5% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.8% of games
7.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 41.4% of games
8.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 39.4% of games
8.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 45.8% of games
0.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 36.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.9%
26W–16L · 52.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova