← Search

Jonathan Ferrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waldorf, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
301 matches · 102W–199L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history301 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Bloomquist · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Murduck
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Murduck
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Bloomquist
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Bloomquist · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Witting
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Witting
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-13 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Shaffer
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Bloomquist · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wyche
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Giap Nguyen
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · Carrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Swann
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Carrington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Mccafferty
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Lebow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Carrington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hayes
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
27%
27W–73L · 41.1% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 52% of games
7.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 41.4% of games
8.0
21.4%
9W–33L · 38.6% of games
8.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 45.8% of games
0.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 36.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
27W–18L · 51.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
83 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova