Michelle Rogers
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
18 matches · 7W–11L · seasons 2019–2019
Match history18 matches
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Rogers (IHP)
CIN Indy Tri Level 3.0-4.0 W, Rogers
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Rogers (WIRC)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Rogers (WIRC)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 W, Rogers (IHP)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 W, Rogers (WIRC)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Rogers (WIRC)
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 W, Davidson (WIRC)
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 7.0 W, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 7.0 W, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, GAP 3.5 W, Cook (IRC-D)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.