← Search

Samuel Pleasure

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Rafael, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 100W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history175 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Chang championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Coleman Bass championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · MARIN TC 55AM8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Schulist championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rennels
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rennels
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manish Singh
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Rennels
loading the estimate
3-5
W
2026-05-23 · Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Lazarchik
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rennels championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-5
W
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Connerley championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rennels championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · MARIN TC 55AM8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Honey
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.8% of games
4.5
64.7%
44W–24L · 54.4% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.4% of games
8.5
25%
2W–6L · 49.3% of games
9.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 48.5% of games
9.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
18W–12L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova