← Search

Jill David

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 91W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history174 matches
L
2026-10-06 · An.Kinlaw18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erica Rankin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-24 · St.Grose40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candice Kish
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-22 · St.Grose55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Mills
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-10 · St.Grose40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connie Haynes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-09-08 · St.Grose55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Mills
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · An.Kinlaw18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Briggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · St.Grose55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaDonna Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · St.Grose55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaDonna Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · An.Kinlaw18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andra Kinlaw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · St.Grose40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Gildea
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-06 · St.Grose40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Rice
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · St.Grose40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Troch
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.2% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.4%
49W–41L · 50.4% of games
6.5
53.2%
25W–22L · 48.1% of games
7.5
50%
8W–8L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe