← Search

Paige Burns

— year-end
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Paige Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-06-27 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ipek Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Claire Phillips / Sarah Roberts
2026-06-18 · Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darci Sachdeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Frenzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-06 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Promnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tea Threatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shari London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Deng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tea Threatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-01 · Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janel Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-15 · Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Bayerl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams6 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe