← Search

Giselle Medina

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Urbana, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
356 matches · 173W–183L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history356 matches
W
Default
2026-08-29 · Anderson & Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Sabasteanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ira Daar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · Anderson & Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Martin
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-5
L
2026-08-10 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Barry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Barry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Roselius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · Anderson & Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Velasco
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-3
L
2026-06-13 · Anderson & Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Schaun Morgan
loading the estimate
6-7
W
2026-06-07 · Anderson & Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Schaun Morgan
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-2
L
2026-05-31 · Anderson & Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylvia Okala
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-4
L
2026-05-30 · Anderson & Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Martin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-4
W
2025-10-30 · Reefe - Tiebreakers 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Guzman Dowdy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.8%
76W–47L · 55.2% of games
4.0
24.3%
9W–28L · 34.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 21.2% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.2% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 44.8% of games
2.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 43% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
24W–27L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
42%
21W–29L · 46.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
85 matches
#1 Singles
8%
29 matches
#2 Singles
6%
21 matches
Singles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert