← Search

Kathalena Cocker

Riverside, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 137W–140L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathalena Cocker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history277 matches
W
2026-09-12 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Brun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-05 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saleshnie Sukhram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · IE-Andulka-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jannah Carrasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saleshnie Sukhram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with GINA SKIBAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-05 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Hebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-05 · IE-CCCC-Knoblach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Layon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Raylynn Roland / Mark Mendoza
2026-06-28 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Ray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · IE-CCCC-Knoblach · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Layon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erkut Aykutlug mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
67.2%
41W–20L · 58.5% of games
4.0
26.8%
19W–52L · 39% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
35W–28L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
111 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams