← Search

Clive Desouza

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 13W–16L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history29 matches
W
2024-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Conghui Wang
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 6-1
W
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Conghui Wang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
Paul Summers / Andrew Hahn
2023-12-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Conghui Wang
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Schmidlkofer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
Sandy McQueen / Bounsana Keomanivong
2023-09-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-03-31 · Cambridge (Karen Reynolds)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherrill Kirch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-03-24 · Cambridge (Karen Reynolds)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Reynolds mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-03-15 · Cambridge (Karen Reynolds)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2023-03-10 · Cambridge (Karen Reynolds)* · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherrill Kirch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-14 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Schmidlkofer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-30 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretta Hall mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tiffany Chernault mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert