← Search

Angela Larisey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 84W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history164 matches
W
2026-11-02 · LCTA39/Daniel/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonia Fokas
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · LCTA/Schuster-Tallmadge/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Femke Maassen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA39/Daniel/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Viktoria Payne
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Daniel/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Cordina
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-12 · LCTA/Schuster-Tallmadge/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Golden
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA39/Daniel/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Cordina
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cristina Garrett championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · LCTA18/Schuster/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madeline Leo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-2
L
2026-07-22 · LCTA18/Schuster/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Tallmadge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · LCTA40/Tallmadge/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Gege
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · LCTA40/Tallmadge/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Tallmadge
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · LCTA40/Tallmadge/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Twombley
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56% of games
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.6% of games
4.0
56.2%
54W–42L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games
7.5
45%
9W–11L · 47.5% of games
8.5
20%
2W–8L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
10 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe