← Search

Jeffrey Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stow, OH
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
133 matches · 89W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history133 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Crider championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
Default
2026-10-24 · C 7.5M LT Derrig · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephen Radachi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-24 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Trapp championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-23 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Trapp championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Crider championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-16 · CX 6.5 LT2 Serdinak · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Shockey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-02 · X55 7.0 LT Mathia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · C 7.5M LT Derrig · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Kidd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Harris
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Harris
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Crawford
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Crider
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
4.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 60.5% of games
4.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.6% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
20W–5L · 63.4% of games
7.5
100%
11W–0L · 65.5% of games
8.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 52.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams