← Search

Nancy Parkerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Winona, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 79W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
W
2026-09-30 · Blakely-Roberts- Winona · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna McNeer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-21 · McNeer-Winona · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna McNeer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-15 · Blakely-Roberts- Winona · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna McNeer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Blakely-Roberts- Winona · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna McNeer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-05-19 · Parkerson-Winona · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Allen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · Parkerson-Winona · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARLEE GOLDEN
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · Parkerson-Winona · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Allen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · Graham-Winona · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARLEE GOLDEN
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Graham-Winona · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Dulin
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-07 · Parkerson-Winona · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARLEE GOLDEN
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-02 · Parkerson-Winona · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARLEE GOLDEN
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-31 · Graham-Winona · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARLEE GOLDEN
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
63.2%
48W–28L · 57.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
51%
25W–24L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer