← Search

Brett Slezak

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history18 matches
L
2023-09-13 · Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonah Clark
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-09-06 · Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Chiu
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-30 · Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Chiu
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-16 · Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Chiu
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-08-09 · Blatt · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Meena S mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-07-14 · Blatt · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ina Satpathy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-16 · Blatt · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ina Satpathy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-06-02 · Blatt · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ina Satpathy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-20 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kyle Krehbiel
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-29 · Slezak · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2020-08-09 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Becky Svatora mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-08-03 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Becky Svatora mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.1% of games
10.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#1 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer