← Search

Scott Frederick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hoover, AL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 48W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-09-09 · HCC - Dobson/Lucas 3.5 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Adams
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-17 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOSH MISNER
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-20 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOSH MISNER
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-06 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Magruder
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-02 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Ragland
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-09-25 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Magruder
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-09 · HCC - Frederick 3.5 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Magruder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-09-04 · HCC - Dobson/Duffey · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Duffey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-28 · HCC - Dobson/Duffey · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marc Dobson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-07-17 · HCC - Dobson/Duffey · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Brandino
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-10 · HCC - Dobson/Duffey · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marc Dobson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-05-08 · HCC - Frederick 2.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOSH MISNER
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 58.8% of games
3.5
51.6%
32W–30L · 50.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal