← Search

Doug Daberko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Reno, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 59W–49L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-25 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wally Murray
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-17 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wally Murray
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-11 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Kroshus
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Wambaugh
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-05 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Conine
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Wambaugh
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · CAUGHLIN 18AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James McCollum
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · CAUGHLIN 18AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Vaughan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · CAUGHLIN 18AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Engel
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-25 · CAUGHLIN 18AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Hotchkiss
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Wambaugh championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · CAUGHLIN 40AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dean Pereos championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
65.3%
47W–25L · 56.7% of games
4.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.1% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova