← Search

Kathryn Moore

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucker, GA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 1W–11L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history12 matches
L
2025-07-08 · Smokerise CC (Rita Maloof)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlene Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 6-7
L
2025-06-10 · Smokerise CC (Rita Maloof)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rita Maloof
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2021-06-30 · Smoke Rise CC (Rita Maloof)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Geltz
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2020-12-08 · Smoke Rise CC (Rita Maloof)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Geltz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2020-12-01 · Smoke Rise CC (Rita Maloof)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Peters
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 5-7
L
Robyn Binger / A Blythe Ryerson
2018-12-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leupold-Cherico
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2018-12-04 · Smoke Rise (Patty Geltz)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Geltz
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2018-11-27 · Smoke Rise (Patty Geltz)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2018-11-20 · Smoke Rise (Patty Geltz)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marsha Kelley
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2018-11-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leupold-Cherico
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2018-07-17 · Smoke Rise (Patty Geltz)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicola White
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 6-7
L
2018-06-26 · Smoke Rise (Patty Geltz)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Geltz
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 28.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 75% of the time
#4 Doubles
75%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova