← Search

Elizabeth Etheridge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Asheville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 63W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-10-14 · WNCK Hetherington (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Hetherington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · WNCK Hetherington (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Ann Wendel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-30 · WNCK Hetherington (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Ann Wendel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-16 · WNCK Hetherington (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Hetherington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-10-04 · WNCT Walker (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Ann Wendel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-09-29 · WNCK McDill (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly McDill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-06 · WNCT Walker (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracey Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-02 · WNCK McDill (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Malt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-08-16 · WNCT Walker (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Sparboe-Derry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-08-11 · WNCK McDill (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly McDill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-15 · WNCM Wendel (ARC S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eleanor Thompson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-2
L
2025-05-13 · WNCA Deeter (ARC S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adriane Deeter
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.1% of games
4.0
60.9%
28W–18L · 52.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.6% of games
7.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams