← Search

Shirley Rexrode

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Piedmont, CA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 45W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history126 matches
W
2026-11-01 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Kettenring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-10-31 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Kettenring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-30 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Forooza Baradar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-25 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elysia Cooke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Kettenring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Baack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-27 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Rexrode mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-05 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Rexrode mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-16 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Chuck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · CLAREMONT R and S 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Whittle
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
35.4%
17W–31L · 45.6% of games
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 28.9% of games
5.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.1% of games
6.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
6.5
10%
1W–9L · 33.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova