← Search

Michele Fredrickson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Eden Prairie, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
412 matches · 190W–222L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history412 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Tatsuda 7.0 ES Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Reidinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-29 · Amundson Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Larson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-22 · Amundson Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-15 · Amundson Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elyse Kharbanda
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-14 · Landrus 40+ ES27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Shields
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · Tatsuda 7.0 ES Mixed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Reidinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-08 · Amundson Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rena Feldman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-07 · Landrus 40+ ES27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tram Struve
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Reidinger mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Reidinger mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · Amundson Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Engdahl championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Homsey 7.0 Summer 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Swanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68%
83W–39L · 58.6% of games
3.5
20%
28W–112L · 38.4% of games
6.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
66%
35W–18L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.2%
38W–48L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
178 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
130 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
93 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer