Anna Griffith
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MADISON, WI
66 matches · 34W–32L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history66 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
WI Mixed 40&Over 8.0 MALT Balakrishnan
WI Mixed 40&Over 8.0 MALT Balakrishnan
WI Tri Delta W Late Fall Doubles MALT DeJarlais
WI Combo Mxd MALT 7.5 Griffith
WI Combo 7.5 Women MALT mitchelson groth
WI Combo Mixed 7.5 MALT Griffith
WI Adult 40&O 4.0W MALT Fields Serve N Turf
WI Combo 7.5 Women MALT Armitage
WI Tri Delta W Spring Day MALT Mitchelson-Groth
WI Combo 7.5 W Malt Mitchelson-Groth Terminetters
WI Combo Mixed 7.5 Malt Griffith
WI Mixed 40&O 8.0 Malt Knigge Tennis Menace
WI Tri Delta Mixed Dbls MALT Knigge
WI Tri Delta W Eve Dbls MALT Martin
WI Tri Delta W Fall Day Dbls MALT Griffith
WI Tri Delta W Spring Day MALT Lund
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 50.7% of games
7.5
64%
16W–9L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.