← Search

Stephanie Greenblatt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 42W–61L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history103 matches
L
2026-10-06 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues Minicozzi/Zacharias-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Binkowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-3
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Burkett/Burkett-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle LaPlante
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Burkett/Burkett-Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Skow
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renu Kielhorn
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Burkett/Burkett-Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Skow
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-2
W
2026-07-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Tobias
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Burkett/Burkett-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tatiana Burkett
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Tobias
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gwyn Minicozzi
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Burkett/Burkett-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Cordts
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Grove
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-30 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Minicozzi/Minicozzi-Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Skow
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.5% of games
3.0
34.1%
14W–27L · 45.3% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 25.6% of games
5.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.7% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 29.7% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova