← Search

Tona White

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Weston, MA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 14W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-07-09 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Markowitz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori LaPlante
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Markowitz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicoline van Riel
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Markowitz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gillian Kohli
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-5
L
2024-06-18 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Huttemann · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Collins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-06-11 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Huttemann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary-Lynne Bohn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-28 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Huttemann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Chadwick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-06-06 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Huttemann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Chadwick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-5, 1-0
W
2023-05-30 · LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Huttemann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yumiko Yeaw
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-07-05 · LFW:LFW Wayland:Gee/Renner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Huttemann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-06-21 · LFW:LFW Wayland:Gee/Renner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margie Keane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-05-31 · LFW:LFW Wayland:Gee/Renner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicoline van Riel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-05-24 · LFW:LFW Wayland:Gee/Renner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicoline van Riel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
70%
14W–6L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams