← Search

Rachel Fernandez-Grant

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 28W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Fernandez-Grant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Eisele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brook Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · LT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · LT PURPLE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · LT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Pasold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-24 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Pasold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Lorick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-19 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-25 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Eisele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-11 · LT BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
40.6%
28W–41L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#1 Singles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams