← Search

Emily Diehl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
412 matches · 227W–185L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history412 matches
W
2026-10-22 · KY/Lex/Simpson/Gallaher · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Shapiro
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · KY/Lex/Simpson/Gallaher · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lola Baker
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-02 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yucong Sang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-10-01 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julia Hutchens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · KY/LEX/Coy · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-28 · KY/LEX/Coy · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne West
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerald Slone mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerald Slone mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerald Slone mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-23 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leah Lykins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-21 · KY/LEX/Coy · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marvetta Overstreet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams101 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65%
93W–50L · 57.8% of games
4.0
42.6%
49W–66L · 45.7% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 31.3% of games
6.5
63%
17W–10L · 53.2% of games
7.5
50%
31W–31L · 48.1% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
128 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
79 matches
#1 Singles
14%
57 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer