← Search

Jeri Carley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Estero, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 33W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-10-31 · The Forest - McDonald · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Ernst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-24 · The Forest - McDonald · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Dannacher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · COLLIER/Adult55&over6.0W / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-13 · COLLIER/Adult55&over6.0W / Bergstrom · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Waldon
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-06 · COLLIER/Adult55&over6.0W / Bergstrom · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · COLLIER/Adult55&over6.0W / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Waldon
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-16 · COLLIER/Adult55&over6.0W / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · Sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Feldman
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-07 · Sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-31 · Sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-24 · Sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-17 · Sterling Oaks / Bergstrom · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Pauls
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games
6.0
50.8%
30W–29L · 52.4% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 23.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams